The High Court dismissed a writ petition, directing the petitioner to pursue the available statutory remedy for challenging the impugned communication while keeping all contentions open for future proceedings.
Petition dismissed keeping statutory remedy open for challenging the impugned communication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp3084
1
ssp
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.3084 OF 2014
Office Notes, Office
Memorandam of Coram,
appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders
or directions and
Registrar’s orders
Mr.Akshay Shinde i/b Mr.A.M.Kulkarni for the
Petitioner
Mr.V.S.Gokhale, AGP for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3.
CORAM : A.S.OKA, &
G.S.KULKARNI,JJ.
DATE : SEPTEMBR 9,2014.
P.C.
1Time is sought on behalf of the
petitioner.The learned AGP pointed
out that statutory remedy is available
forchallengingtheimpugned
communication dated 31.12.2013. We
accordingly dispose of the petition by
keeping the statutory remedy of the
petitionerexpresslyopen.All
contentions are kept open.
Petitioner
Respondent Nos. 1 to 3
A.S.OKA
G.S.KULKARNI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court