The High Court of Bombay disposed of Writ Petition No. 3027 of 2014 as infructuous because the respondent had already passed an order on the show cause notice, rendering the petition no longer consequential.
The petition was disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp3027
1
ssp
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.3027 OF 2014
Office Notes, Office
Memorandam of Coram,
appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders
or directions and
Registrar’s orders
Mr.P.B.Shah i/b Mr.Shah Kayval P. for the Petitioner
Mr.S.N.Patil, AGP for the Respondent No.1.
Mr.Rupesh Bobade for respondent No.2
CORAM : A.S.OKA, &
G.S.KULKARNI,JJ.
DATE : SEPTEMBR 9,2014.
P.C.
1The learned counsel for the
petitioner states that an order is
already passed on the show cause notice
andthepetitionhasbecome
infructuous. Hence, we dispose of the
petition as infructuous.
Office Notes, Office Memorandum
Respondent No. 1
Respondent No. 2
A.S. Oka
G.S. Kulkarni
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court