The petitioner approached this court regarding an encroachment on an access way to her field. The respondents confirmed the encroachment had been removed, leading the court to dispose of the writ petition.
None; matter disposed after confirming encroachment removal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 wp2115.14
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO.2115 OF 2014.
(SMT. VIMAL RAMESHJI DHORE..VS..STATE OF MAH. REVENUE DEPT. & OTH.)
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND
P.R.BORA, JJ.
DATED : SEPTEMBER 01, 2014.
The learned Additional Government Pleader, appearing on behalf of the respondents, states that the encroachment on the access way to the field of the petitioner has been removed and this fact has been communicated to the learned Additional Government Pleader by the concerned respondent.
The learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute this position.
In view of the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of with no order as to costs.
JUDGE JUDGE
RRaut..
Smt. Vimal Rameshji Dhore
State of Maharashtra
Revenue Dept.
Others
Vasanti A. Naik
P.R. Bora
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
