Petitioners challenged bid acceptance regarding Tur Dal tenders from 2000. Court dismissed the petition as the cause of action became infructuous due to the lapse of time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp648-2000
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION No.648 OF 2000
Sunil s/o Balaji Bolkilwar and another.
Vrs.
The State of Maharashtara and 9 others.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders
Shri M.M. Agnihotri, counsel for petitioners. Shri S. Ukey, AGP for respondent no.1.
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND P.R. BORA, JJ.
DATE : 28th AUGUST , 2014 .
By this petition, the petitioners challenge the acceptance of the bids of the respondent bidders and seek a direction to the respondent nos. 1 to 5 to reassess the selling price of Tur Dal.
The tenders or bids were called for purchase of Tur Dal in the year 2000. The petitioners have challenged the acceptance of the bids in pursuance of the tenders/bids invited in the year 2000. It appears on a reading of the petition and the prayer clauses that the cause for filing the petition has been rendered infructuous due to passage of time.
In the result, the writ petition fails and is dismissed with no order as to costs.
JUDGE JUDGE
Hirekhan
Sunil s/o Balaji Bolkilwar and another
The State of Maharashtra and 9 others
Vasanti A. Naik
P.R. Bora
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
