Petitioner sought leave to withdraw the writ petition. The written instructions were recorded, and the petition was disposed of as withdrawn.
Writ petition disposed of as withdrawn upon recording of written instructions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP 117/13
- 1 -
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.117/2013
Shree Ganesh Goods Transport Company.
...Petitioner..
Versus
Maharashtra State Warehouse Corporation
& others.
...Respondents...
.....
Smt.Snehal S. Jadhav, Advocate h/f Shri R.L. Kute,
Advocate for petitioner.
Shri M.M. Nerlikar, AGP for the State.
.....
CORAM: R.M. BORDE &
A.M. BADAR, JJ.
DATE: 06.03.2014
ORDER :
The learned counsel for the petitioner tenders on
record the written instructions received from the client,
which is taken on record and marked as Exhibit X for
identification and seeks leave to withdraw the petition.
The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
(A.M. BADAR, J.) (R.M. BORDE, J.)
ndk/c631430
Shree Ganesh Goods Transport Company
Maharashtra State Warehouse Corporation
R.M. BORDE
A.M. BADAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court