Petitioner-Institution challenged marking awarded in violation of State Government Resolution dated 05.12.2012. Court advised representation to level committees and disposed writ petitions with liberty.
None granted beyond advising representation to committees and disposing of applications with liberty.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp193614.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.1936 OF 2014
Tirupati Pratishtan's Andhori, Tq.Ahmedpur, District Latur Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & others Respondents
WITH WRIT PETITION NO.1937 OF 2014 Tirupati Pratishtan's Andhori, Tq.Ahmedpur, District Latur Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & others Respondents
WITH WRIT PETITION NO.1938 OF 2014 Tirupati Pratishtan's Andhori, Tq.Ahmedpur, District Latur Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & others Respondents
WITH WRIT PETITION NO.4183 OF 2013 Tirupati Pratishtan's Andhori, Tq.Ahmedpur, District Latur Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & others Respondents
{2}
wp193614.odt
Mr.V.D.Hon, advocate holding for Mr.P.S.Pawar, advocate for the petitioner/s.
Mr.K.G.Patil, A.G.P. for Respondents.
CORAM : R.M.BORDE &
A.M.BADAR, JJ. DATE :05th March, 2014
PER COURT:
1 It is the grievance of the petitioner-Institution that the petitioner-Institution has been awarded marks in violation of the directives issued by the State Government under the Resolution dated 05.12.2012, as a result of which, proposal tendered by the petitioner has not been forwarded with favourable recommendations to the State Level Committee.
2 It would be open for the petitioner to point out the error committed while computing marks to the District Level Committee as well as State Level Committee by making appropriate representation. If the petitioner tenders appropriate representation, it may be taken into account by the concerned Committees in accordance with the procedure prescribed in that behalf.
3 With the liberty as above, writ petitions stand disposed of.
JUDGE
JUDGE
adb/wp193614
R.M.BORDE
A.M. BADAR
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner-Institution's grievance regarding violation of State Government directives in awarding marks warrants judicial intervention.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Tirupati Pratishtan's Andhori, Tq.Ahmedpur, District Latur
The State of Maharashtra
R.M. Borde
A.M. Badar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
