Dismissed
Bharatsing Gulabsingh Lakhad and Others v. the State of Maharashtra and Others
Bombay HCWP/2130/2014
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP 2130.14 - 1 -
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.2130/2014
BHARATSING GULABSINGH LAKHAD AND OTHERS
...PETITIONERS...
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS.
...RESPONDENTS...
.....
Shri Nanabhau R. Thorat, Advocate for Petitioners.
Mrs. M.A. Deshpande, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 4.
Shri S.G. Bhalerao, Advocate for Respondent No.5.
.....
CORAM: B.P. DHARMADHIKARI &
A.M. BADAR, JJ.
DATE: 16.12.2014
ORDER :
1]Heard for some time.
2]Application filed within time after the judgment of
High Court dated 23.3.2009 is not annexed. Though in one
representation, date of said application is declared to
be 27.5.2009, its copy is not annexed. Similarly, in
writ petition, there is no reference to any such
application dated 27.5.2009. At page no.9 of writ
petition in paragraph no.8, the date of last
representation is also not mentioned and it is kept
blank.
WP 2130.14 - 2 -
3]In this situation, with liberty to petitioners to
approach again on same cause, we dispose of present
petition. No order as to costs.
ndk/ c16121432.doc
BHARATSING GULABSINGH LAKHAD AND OTHERS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS
B.P. DHARMADHIKARI
A.M. BADAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court