This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
pil-87.14
1
ash
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.87 OF 2014
Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions & Registrar’s orders.
Court’s or Judge’s orders.
Shri Sham V. Walve for the Petitioner.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & A.A. SAYED, JJ DATED : 3RD APRIL 2014
P.C.:
. Not on Board. Taken on board.
2. Perused the averments made in the Petition.
The entire cause of action for filing this Petition has arisen in Mumbai. We, therefore, transfer this Petition to the Original Side of this Court. The consequential amendment shall be carried out by the Petitioner within a period of two weeks from today.
Petitioner
A.S. OKA
A.A. SAYED
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court