The High Court of Judicature at Bombay allowed a civil application seeking restoration, holding that the averments in paragraph 2 established a valid case. The petition is listed for admission according to CMIS.
Application allowed. Petition listed for admission on date fixed as per CMIS.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
caw594
1
ssp
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.594 OF 2014 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.3449 OF 2011
Office Notes, Office
Memorandam of Coram,
appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders
or directions and
Registrar’s orders
Mr.P.D.Dalvi for the Applicant
Mr.V.S.Gokhale, AGP for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4.
CORAM : A.S.OKA, &
A.A.SAYED,JJ.
DATE : APRIL 2, 2014.
P.C.
1Heard the learned counsel for the
applicant and the learned AGP for
respondent Nos.1 to 4. In view of the
averments made in the application and
in particular paragraph 2 thereof, a
case for restoration is made out.
Application is allowed in terms of
prayer clauses (a) and (b). Petition
shall be listed for admission on the
date fixed as per the CMIS.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a case for restoration is made out based on averments in paragraph 2 of the application.
Applicant
Respondent Nos.1 to 4
A.S.Okka
A.A.Sayed
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court