The Single Bench of this Court dismissed PIL-75 of 2014 as withdrawn on preliminary objections. No adjudication was made on the merits, and party contentions were kept open.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn without adjudication on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
pil-75.14
1
pmw
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTERST LITIGATION NO.75 OF 2014
Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders.
Mr. J. Shekhar i/by J. Shekhar & Co., for the Petitioner. Mrs. M.P. Thakur, AGP, for the Respondent Nos.1 to 12. Mr. G.S. Godbole i/by Mr. Drupad Sopan Patil, for Respondent No.13.
CORAM : A.S. OKA &
G.S. KULKARNI, JJ.
DATE : 19th SEPTEMBER, 2014
P.C.
. Considering the preliminary objections
raised by the Respondents, the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner seeks permission
to withdraw the Petition. We, accordingly, dismiss the Petition as withdrawn. However,
we make it clear that no adjudication has been made on the issue raised in this Petition and all contentions of the parties are kept open.
(G.S. KULKARNI, J ) (A.S.OKA, J )
1 of 1
Unnamed Petitioner
Respondent Nos. 1 to 13
A.S. OKA
G.S. KULKARNI
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
