Allowed

Shri. Dilip D. Amane and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, Dept of Co-Operation Marketing and Textile and Ors.

Bombay HC24 Sept 2014PIL/226/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Mumbai granted leave to the petitioners to withdraw the filed public interest litigation. An interim status quo order was extended until 31st October 2014 while all contentions on merits were kept open and the court expressed no opinion on merit.

What did the court decide?

Leave to withdraw the PIL was granted; interim status quo continued till 31st October 2014.

Shri. Dilip D. Amane and Ors. Vs the State of… — Public Procurement and Tenders | Bombay HC (2014)

¶1

226.13pil.sxw

¶2

1/2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE

¶4

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 226 OF 2013

¶5

Shri Dilip D. Amane and others. ... Petitioners. V/s. The State of Maharashtra and others. ... Respondents.

¶6

G.S.Godbole i/b. D.S.Patil for the petitioners.

¶7

Vishal Thadani, AGP for respondent Nos.1 to 6.

¶8

A.A.Kumbhakoni, Senior Advocate i/b. V.R.Gaikwad for respondent No.7.

¶9

N.V.Pawar for respondent No.8.

¶10

Rakesh L. Singh i/b. M.V.Kini & Co. for respondent No.9.

¶11

A.M.Kulkarni for respondent No.10.

¶12

CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL AND B.P.COLABAWALLA, JJ.

¶13

DATED : 24th September 2014.

¶14

P.C. :

¶15

We have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties for

¶16

some time.

¶17

Mr.Godbole, learned counsel for the petitioners, on instructions, submits that a fresh writ petition would be filed concerning

¶18

2/2 226.13pil.sxw

¶19

subject matter of this PIL raising challenge to the sale of immovable property of society in liquidation, Vita Urban Cooperative Credit Society Ltd. He, therefore, seeks leave to withdraw this PIL. Learned counsel further submits that an amount of Rs.25 lakh was deposited by the petitioner with the registry of this Court. He submits that, for the present, the petitioners are not insisting for withdrawal of the said amount of Rs.25 lakh. Learned counsel prays that interim relief of statusquo granted by this Court on 13^th December 2013 may be continued for sometime so that the petitioner would take effective steps.

¶20

We grant leave to the petitioner to withdraw this PIL.

¶21

The order of statusquo granted by this Court vide order dated13th December 2013 shall continue till 31^st October 2014.

¶22

All contentions on merits are kept open. It is clarified that we have not expressed any opinion on merits of the matter.

¶23

With the aforesaid observation PIL is disposed of as withdrawn.

¶24

(B.P.COLABAWALLA, J.) (NARESH H. PATIL, J.)

¶25

Sanjay Nanoskar, P.S..

Shri. Dilip D. Amane and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, Dept of Co-Operation Marketing and Textile and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shri. Dilip D. Amane and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, Dept of Co-Operation Marketing and Textile and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sevasankalp Jankalyan Pratishthan Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Mr. Purushottam Salvi Vs State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, Ministry of Urban Development and Ors.

Shri. Pramod Sahebrao Arsul Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Mukul Suryakan Gujar Vs the Cheif Election Commissioner and 3 Others

Sanjay Kumar Lalit Vs the Union of India and 2 Others

Meera Sanyal and Anr. Vs Union of India and 3 Ors.

Praful Vithal Loke Vs Election Commission of India and Ors.

Shri. Chandrakant Keshav Palav Vs the State of Maharashtra, through Sub Divisional Officer and Anr.

Bharat Forge Employees Union, Chakan Vs Regional Provident Fund Commissioner and Ors.

Shri. Jagu Hari, through Power of Attorney Holder, Shri. Mukesh Patel Vs Shri. Pramod Keshrichand Shah and Ors.

Bhanabhai Kariabhai, through Power of Attorney Holder, Shri. Mukesh Patel and Anr. Vs Shri. Pramod Keshrichand Shah and Ors.

Shri. Dilip D. Amane and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, Dept of Co-Operation Marketing and Textile and Ors.

M/S. Dolphin Inpression Pvt. Ltd. Vs United Spirits Ltd. (Shaw Wallace Distilleries Ltd.)

Vivek S/O Sudhakarroa Kulkarni Vs the State Bank of India and Others