This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/3
Dixit
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.155 OF 2014 IN REVIEW PETITION (ST.) NO.18571 OF 2014 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.978 OF 1997
Solapur Municipal Corporation, Through its Commissioner … Applicant V/s. Ajit Narsinha Takalikar & Ors. … Respondents
ALONG WITH WRIT PETITION NO.8057 OF 2014
Narsinha Mahadeo Taklikar (deceased) Through Ajit Narsinha Takalikar … Petitioner V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents
Mr. Vijay Killedar for the Applicant in CAW/155/2014 and for Respondent No.5 in WP/8057/2014.
Dr. Ramdas P. Sabban for the Petitioner in WP/8057/2014 and for Respondent No.1 in CAW/155/2014.
Mr. V.S. Gokhale, A.G.P., for the Respondent-State.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & G.S. KULKARNI, J.J. DATE : 14TH OCTOBER, 2014 .
P.C. :
2/3
present in the Court, who has filed affidavit dated 13th October, 2014. We have perused the Judgment and Order dated 19th September, 2014, passed by this Court in the present Writ Petition and in the Review Petition. The stand taken by Mr. Chavan in the affidavit is that he has not made any incorrect statement in his earlier affidavit regarding the possession of the Petitioner in respect of property in dispute, but he has merely reproduced what is set out in the Minutes of the Order filed in Writ Petition No.978 of 1997. He pointed out that in the affidavit-in-reply filed by him in Writ Petition No.10379 of 2009, it was stated that the possession of the excess land was taken over on 16th February, 1995. His contention is that he has not made any incorrect statement in the affidavit.
3/3
(G.S. KULKARNI, J.) (A.S. OKA, J.)
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the discharge of the appellant involves an extra-territorial violation of fundamental rights or is valid under Article 271(3).
Whether the trial of a writ petition involves a denial of natural justice or is valid under Article 29(1) and Article 29(2).
Whether the petition for a writ of certiorari is maintainable or is barred by Article 226(5).
Solapur Municipal Corporation
Ajit Narsinha Takalikar
Narsinha Mahadeo Taklikar
A.S. Oka
G.S. Kulkarni
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
