The Bombay High Court disposed of Public Interest Litigation No. 70 of 2010 as withdrawn on the petitioner's counsel seeking permission, while reserving judgment on a dispute raised in a letter.
Petition disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Deshmane
1
23.PIL.70-10.doc
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.70 OF 2010
[Sopanrao Pandharinath Nikam Vs. State of Maharashtra]
Office Notes, Office Memorandam of Coram, Court’s or Judge’s Orders appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders
Mr. Abhijit Kadam, for the Petitioner. CORAM : A.S. OKA, AND A. S. CHANDURKAR, JJ. DATE : 16th JUNE, 2014
P.C. :-
(A. S. CHANDURKAR, J.) (A. S. OKA, J.)
1 / 1
Sopanrao Pandharinath Nikam
State of Maharashtra
A.S. OKA
A. S. CHANDURKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
