The High Court of Judicature at Bombay dismissed a writ petition as withdrawn. The petitioner sought to withdraw the petition due to a declaration issued under Section 126 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Deshmane
1
prod.2.wp.5152-13.doc
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.5152 OF 2013
[Mr. Vasudeo Narhari Dhage Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.]
Office Notes, Office Memorandam of Coram, Court’s or Judge’s Orders appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders
Mr. Shardul Singh i/b. Sushma Singh, for the Petitioner.
Mr. V.S. Gokhale, AGP for respondent Nos.1 & 2. Mr. Kuldip Pawar i/b. Sanjeev M. Gorwadkar, for respondent No.3.
CORAM : A.S. OKA, AND A. S. CHANDURKAR, JJ. DATE : 16th JUNE, 2014 P.C. :
(A. S. CHANDURKAR, J.) (A. S. OKA, J.)
1 / 1
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mr. Vasudeo Narhari Dhage
The State of Maharashtra
Other Respondents
A. S. Oka
A. S. Chandurkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
