The court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn by the petitioner in view of a notification under Section 21 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act. No further adjudication was required.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Deshmane
1
26.WP.5153-13.doc
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.5153 OF 2013
[Shri Narhari Ganpati Dhage Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.]
Office Notes, Office Memorandam of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders
Court’s or Judge’s Orders
Mr. Shardul Singh, i/b. Sushma Singh, for the Petitioner.
Ms. S.S. Bhende, AGP, for Respondent Nos.1 & 2. Mr. Sanjeev M. Gorwadkar, for Respondent No.3.
CORAM : A.S. OKA, AND A. S. CHANDURKAR, JJ. DATE : 16th JUNE, 2014 P.C. :
(A. S. CHANDURKAR, J.) (A. S. OKA, J.)
1 / 1
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shri Narhari Ganpati Dhage
The State of Maharashtra
A. S. OKA
A. S. CHANDURKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
