The court disposed of PIL No. 60/2012 concerning tender challenges, observing that the tender period had expired and no issues survived a prior notice of motion order. The associated chamber summons was also disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
pil-60.12(OS)
1
ash
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.60 OF 2012
Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders.
None for the Petitioner.
Shri E.P. Bharucha, Senior counsel along with Ms. K.R. Punjabi for the BMC. Shri J.S. Saluja, AGP for Respondent No.1-State.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & G.S.KULKARNI, JJ DATED : 15TH SEPTEMBER 2014
P.C.:
. None appears for the Petitioner. We have
heard the learned senior counsel appearing for the second Respondent and the learned AGP for the first Respondent.
2pil-60.12(OS)
ash
statement of the Municipal Corporation recorded in the said order and in view of what is recorded in Paragraph 7 of the said order, nothing survives in this Public Interest Litigation. Accordingly, the Public Interest Litigation is disposed of.
(G.S.KULKARNI, J) (A.S.OKA, J)
A.S. OKA
G.S. KULKARNI
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court