Court permitted petitioner to withdraw PIL regarding transfer of respondent outside Ahmednagar District. Petition stood dismissed as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw petition; petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach concerned officer.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 113 OF 2014
Sanjay Bhaskarrao Kale
Petitioner
V E R S U S
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Respondents
Mr. S.B. Talekar, Advocate for the petitioner
Mr. S.G. Kalekar, AGP for the respondent/State
CORAM : A. V. NIRGUDE &
A.I.S. CHEEMA, JJ.
DATE : 9th September, 2014
PER COURT :
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks
permission to withdraw this petition. This petition
is allowed to be withdrawn. In view of this petition
stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach
concerned officer who is empowered to transfer
respondent no.5 outside Ahmednagar District.
(A.I.S. CHEEMA, J.) (A.V. NIRGUDE, J.)
SRM/9/9/14
Sanjay Bhaskarrao Kale
The State of Maharashtra
A.V.Nirgude
A.I.S.Cheema
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court