This is a brief order dismissing a civil application for condonation of delay in filing a review petition, holding that no condonation is necessary as the impugned appeal was already decided on merits.
Application for condonation of delay is rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 cao-199.14 in rpmst-23954.14
pmw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.199 OF 2014 IN REVIEW PETITION (ST.) NO.23954 OF 2014 IN
FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.198 OF 2007
Deepak Dhansukhalal Vanjara … Petitioner
Vs.
Rasila D/o Ranchhoddas Naram
… Respondent
Smt. Sulbha A. Dhamale, for the Applicant.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & G.S. KULKARNI, JJ.
P.C.
Not on Board. Taken on board.
. This is an application for condonation of delay in the Review Petition. Applicant has a remedy available under Rule 21 of Order XLI of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether delay in filing a review petition can be condoned when the appeal has been decided on merits.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Deepak Dhansukhalal Vanjara
Rasila D/o Ranchhoddas Naram
A.S. OKA
G.S. KULKARNI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
