This order transferred a PIL regarding heritage structures in Mumbai from the appellate side to the Original Side for consequential amendments to be placed before an appropriate Bench.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Deshmane
1
41.PIL.58-14.doc
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.58 OF 2014 [Ketan Tirodkar Vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr.]
Office Notes, Office Memorandam of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders
Court’s or Judge’s Orders
Mr. Ketan Tirodkar, petitioner present in-person.
CORAM : A.S. OKA, AND A. S. CHANDURKAR, JJ. DATE : 16th JUNE, 2014
P.C. :-
1 / 1
Ketan Tirodkar
State of Maharashtra
A.S. OKA
A. S. CHANDURKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
