Petitioners sought leave to withdraw a Public Interest Litigation with liberty to pursue alternative remedies; the court granted leave and disposed of the petition as withdrawn.
Leave granted to withdraw petition with liberty to pursue alternative remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
- 1 -
PIL 34/14
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.34/2014
Sanjay Panditrao Harshe
and another.
...Petitioners..
Versus
Union of India & others.
...Respondents...
.....
Shri A.G. Talhar, Advocate for petitioners.
Shri Alok Sharma, Standing Counsel for respondent no.1.
Shri S.G. Karlekar, AGP for respondent no.2.
.....
CORAM: R.M. BORDE &
A.M. BADAR, JJ.
DATE: 03.04.2014
ORDER :
Learnedcounselforthepetitioners,on
instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the petition with
liberty to pursue the alternative remedy available in
law. Leave is granted. The petition is disposed of as
withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
(A.M. BADAR, J.) (R.M. BORDE, J.)
ndk/c34148
Sanjay Panditrao Harshe
Union of India
R.M. BORDE
A.M. BADAR
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court