Human Rights Foundation v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
1 pil-24-12 IN THE HIGH COURT
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
pil-24-12
Uday P. Kambli
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.24 OF 2012
Human Rights Foundation ..Petitioner v/s. The State of Maharashtra & ors. ..Respondents
WITH
WRIT PETITION (L) NO.661 OF 2014 WITH WRIT PETITION (L) NO.660 OF 2014 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.792 OF 2014 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.879 OF 1999
Mr.Sudhanshu Agarwal for the petitioner in WP (L) No.660 of 2014.
Mr.Anil Rao for respondent No.5. Mr.B.V.Phadnis for SRA.
Mr.Rakesh L.Singh i/b M.V.Kini & Co. for respondent No.3. Ms.Pinaz Contractor for petitioner in WT(S) No.661/14. Ms.Yamuna Parikh for BMC....
CORAM: MOHIT S. SHAH, C.J. & M.S.SANKLECHA, J. DATE : 10 JULY 2014
P.C.:
Order below the precipe dated 9 July 2014.
Having regard to the nature of prayer, it will be open to the concerned party to file a notice of motion for review of the judgment dated 20 June 2014.
CHIEF JUSTICE
Human Rights Foundation
The State of Maharashtra
Mohit S. Shah
M.S. Sanklecha
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court