The court considered a notice of motion to condone a 191-day delay in filing a written statement. The delay was condoned based on the affidavit, and the written statement was accepted.
Condonation of 191 days delay and written statement taken on file.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NM-209
ASN
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.209 OF 2014 IN
SUIT NO.552 OF 2012
Mr.Ramesh Sippy.
..Plaintiff.
vs.
Mr.Suresh Sippy and ors.
..Defendants.
Ms.Gulnar Mistri i/by Bachubhai Munim and Co. for the Plaintiff. Mr. Nikhil Wagle i/by Jaykar & Partners for Defendant Nos.3 and 4.
CORAM : M. S. SANKLECHA, J. DATE : 19 JUNE 2014
PC:
This notice of motion has been taken out by defendant Nos. 3 and 4 seeking condonation of delay of 191 days in filing the written statement. For the reasons set out in the affidavit in support, delay is condoned. Written statement to be taken on file. Notice of motion is disposed of.
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to condone a delay of 191 days in filing the written statement.
Whether to allow the notice of motion to proceed with the written statement being taken on file.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mr. Suresh Sippy
M. S. Sanklecha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
