Petitioner applied for leave to withdraw the Public Interest Litigation. Court granted leave dismissing the PIL as withdrawn and disposed of pending applications.
Leave granted to withdraw the PIL; PIL dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURNAGABAD
Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders.
COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
3 PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 18 OF 2013
ASHOK SANTOSHRAO LAD VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. C. V. Thombre GP for Respondents : Mr. S. V. Kurundkar
CORAM : R. M. BORDE & A.M. BADAR, JJ. Dated: April 11, 2014
PER COURT :
( A.M. BADAR, J. ) ( R. M. BORDE, J. )
dyb
Ashok Santoshrao Lad
The State of Maharashtra
R. M. Borde
A. M. Badar
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
