Disposed
Waheed Mehmood Sayyed v. the State of Maharashtra and Others
Bombay HCPIL/47/2014
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
47.14.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
pil 47.14.odt
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.47 OF 2014
Waheed Mehmood Sayyed
Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others.
Respondent/s
Mr. C.V. Dharurkar, advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. K.G. Patil, AGP for the Respondent
CORAM : R.M. BORDE &
A.M. BADAR, JJ.
DATE : 15TH APRIL, 2014.
PER COURT:
1]Counsel for petitioner seeks leave to
withdraw the petition, with liberty to approach the
National Green Tribunal, under the National Green
Tribunal Act, 2010.
2]With liberty as aforesaid, writ petition
(PIL) is permitted to be withdrawn at the request of
the learned counsel for the petitioner.
[A.M. BADAR][R.M. BORDE]
JUDGEJUDGE.
grt/-
Waheed Mehmood Sayyed
The State of Maharashtra
R.M. BORDE
A.M. BADAR
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court