This PIL petition was disposed of without decision as the learned counsel stated the challenge did not survive due to subsequent developments and passage of time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
pil-87.10
1
pmw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.87 OF 2010
Anant Shivaji Naik and Anr. … Petitioners
V/s.
Collector of Sindhudurg and others … Respondents
Mr. Suresh M. Sabrad, for the Petitioners. Mr. S.N. Patil, AGP, for the Respondent Nos.1, 3 and 5.
P.C.
. The learned counsel appearing for the Petitioners states
that in view of the subsequent development and with the passage of time, the challenge in this Petition does not survive. Accordingly, the Petition does not survive and the same is disposed of.
(A.A. SAYED, J ) (A.S.OKA, J )
1 of 1
Anant Shivaji Naik and Anr.
Collector of Sindhudurg and others
A.A. Sayed
A.S. Oka
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
