This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
dgm 1
47-pil-16-14.sxw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 16 OF 2014
Mr. Nandkumar Rajaram Mandale vs
Mr. R.G. Hodage and ors
.... Petitioner
.... Respondents
Mr. Uday B. Nighot for the petitioner. Mr.Sanjeev J.Rairkar with Mr. Nikhil Vidwans for respondents 3 and 4.
Ms. M. S. Bane, “B” Panel counsel for respondent No.5.
CORAM: ANOOP V. MOHTA AND N.M. JAMDAR, JJ.
DATE : December 18, 2014
P.C.:
Heard.
2 After arguing the matter for some time, the learned
counsel appearing for the Petitioner, seeks to withdraw the present Petition. The Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
(N. M. JAMDAR, J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)
1/1
Mr. Nandkumar Rajaram Mandale
Mr. R.G. Hodage and ors
Anoop V. Mohta
N.M. Jamdar
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
