Single-judge order extending time for filing arguments in a writ petition. The High Court disposed of the civil application standing disposed of.
Time for filing arguments was extended; the civil application was disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
58 CAW 2150-14 in WP 3987-11.doc
Sequeira
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2150 OF 2014
(For extension of time)
The State of Maharashtra (through its Secretary, Tribal Development Department Mantralaya, & anr. .. Applicants /(Nos.1 and 2 are Org. Respndt. Nos.1 & 2)
Vs Avinash Bharat Ahire & ors. .. Respondents
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 3987 OF 2011 Avinash Bharat Ahire. .. Petitioner Vs State of Maharashtra through its Secretary, Tribal Development Department, Mantralaya & ors. .. Respondents
Mrs.M.S.Bane, 'B-Panel' counsel, for Applicants. Ms.Ashwini Selukar h/f Mrs.Anamika Malhotra, for Respondent No.4.
CORAM: ANOOP V. MOHTA &
N.M.JAMDAR, JJ. Wednesday 17 December, 2014.
P.C.:
Time as prayed is extended. Civil application is disposed of.
N.M.JAMDAR, J.
ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.
The State of Maharashtra
Avinash Bharat Ahire
Anoop V. Monha
N. M. Jamdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
