This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
pil158
1
ssp
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.158 OF 2010
Office Notes, Office
Memorandam of Coram,
appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders
or directions and
Registrar’s orders
None for the Petitioner
Mr.Vijay Patil for the Respondent No.1.
Mr.Datta Pawar i/b M/s.Onash Legus for respondent
Nos.2 to 5
Mr.S.N.Patil, AGP for respondent Nos.7 & 8.
CORAM : A.S.OKA, &
A.A.SAYED,JJ.
DATE : APRIL 9, 2014.
P.C.
1None appeared for the petitioner
though the petition is called out on
two occasions. We, accordingly,
dismissthepetitionfornon
prosecution.
(A.A.SAYED,J)(A.S.OKA,J.)
No.158 of 2010
Respondent No.1
Respondents Nos.2 to 5
Respondent Nos.7 & 8
A.S. OKA
A.A. SAYED
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court