Shri. Nitin Dattatrya Jagtap v. Pune Municipal Corporation, Pune and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
ssp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
pil147
1
ssp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELATE JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.147 OF 2011
Nitin Dattatray Jagtap ...Petitioner
vs.
Pune Municipal Corporation
and others...Respondents
Mr.Rajaram Deshmukh i/b Ashok Pathare for the
Petitioner
Mr.Rajdeep Khadapkar for the respondent Nos.1 to 3
Mr.V.S.Gokhale, AGP for respondent Nos.4 to 6.
CORAM : A.S.OKA, &
A.S.CHANDURKAR, JJ.
DATE : JULY 30,2014
P.C.:
1For the reasons separately recorded in the
Judgment, we dispose of the petition.
Nitin Dattatray Jagtap
Pune Municipal Corporation
A.S. Oka
A.S. Chandurkar
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court