This PIL petition sought a direction to open a Girls Hostel at Vengurla after the petitioner claimed the facility was ready. The court directed the respondent to decide the representations within four weeks.
Direct the respondent to decide the representations regarding the opening of the Girls Hostel within four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
PIL158.14
krs
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.158 OF 2014
Shri Mahesh Lumaji Parulekar V/s.
State of Maharashtra & Anr. : Respondents
Ms Rani A. Patil with Mr.Virendra Neve for the Petitioner.
Ms S.S. Bhende, Asstt. Govt. Pleader for the Respondents.
CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA & A.A. SAYED, JJ.
DATE : AUGUST 04, 2014.
P.C.:
Rule, returnable forthwith.
Ms Bhende, learned Asstt. Govt. Pleader waives service for the Respondents.
Heard finally by consent of parties.
present PIL by directing Respondent no.2 to decide the representations as early as possible preferably within four weeks, in accordance with law.
1 of 2
PIL158.14
krs
( ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)
(A.A. SAYED, J.)
2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to direct the respondent to decide the petitioner's representations regarding the opening of a Girls Hostel at Vengurla.
Shri Mahesh Lumaji Parulekar
State of Maharashtra
Anoop V. Mota
A.A. Sayed
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
