Petitioner challenged an election which was declared infructuous due to the passage of time. The court disposed of the writ petition and pending civil application citing them as infructuous.
Petition dismissed as infructuous; pending Civil Application disposed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
G.A.Ghule [P.A.]
1/1
wp 4262.11.sxw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY. BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION.
WRIT PETITION NO. 4262 OF 2011 WITH CA/8390/2011 IN WP/4262/2011
BHAUSAHEB VYANKAT KARAD AND ORS VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARSHTRA AND ORS
Appearance =>
Mr. V. D. Gunale, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr. P.P. More, Asstt.Govt.Pleader for the State of Maharashtra.
CORAM : B.P. Dharmadhikari & A.M. Badar, JJ. DATE : 23rd December, 2014.
Per Court :-
Mr. V D Gunale, learned counsel states that challenge to the election is rendered infructuous, due to passage of time.
[2] Mr. More, learned Asstt.Govt.Pleader appears for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Petition is disposed of as infructuous. Pending Civil Application is also disposed of.
(A.M. BADAR, J.) (B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Bhausaheb Vyankat Karad
The State of Maharashtra
B.P. Dharmadhikari
A.M. Badar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
