The first appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution as the appellant had no instructions and chose not to prosecute the matter.
The first appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
1107fa122.11.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
First Appeal No.122 of 2011
(Sau. Sheetal Pawan Patil v. Pawan Sahadeorao Patil)
Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's order
Ms R.A. Jaiswal, Counsel for the Respondent.
Coram : Smt. Vasanti A. Naik & V.K. Jadhav, JJ. Dated : 11th July, 2014
On 30-6-2014, the counsel for the appellant made a statement that he had no instructions in the matter and hence a notice was sent to the appellant by the counsel that the power would be withdrawn. The matter was adjourned at the request of the counsel for the appellant in that background.
None appears for the appellant today.
It appears that the appellant is not desirous of prosecuting the first appeal.
The first appeal is, therefore, dismissed for want of prosecution.
Judge Judge
pdl
Sheetal Pawan Patil
Pawan Sahadeorao Patil
Vasanti A. Naik
V.K. Jadhav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
