The petitioner stated the cause is infructuous due to passage of time and no longer wishes to prosecute; the writ petition was disposed of without costs.
The writ petition was disposed of with no order as to costs. The rule was discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP2045-04
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 2045/2004
(MAH. RAJYA HAMAL MAPADI MAHAMANDAL VERSUS GOVT. OF MAH. & OTHERS)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND V.K. JADHAV, JJ.
DATE : JULY 10, 2014.
Learned counsel Shri Kadu holding for Shri Khan, the learned counsel for the petitioner, states that the cause for filing the writ petition has been rendered infructuous due to passage of time. The learned counsel states that the petitioner is, therefore, not desirous of prosecuting the writ petition.
In view of the aforesaid statement, the writ petition is disposed of with no order as to costs. Rule stands discharged.
JUDGE JUDGE
APTE
Mah. Rajya Hamal Mapadi Mahamandal
Govt. of Mah.
Vasanti A. Naik
V.K. Jadhav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
