The High Court at Nagpur dismissed a writ petition challenging the election programme of 2003-04 as infructuous, citing that the office term of the Gram Panchayat Member had expired.
Disposed of with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP3929-04
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 3929/2004
(ABARAO NAGORAO DALVI VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, BOMBAY & OTHERS)
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND
V.K. JADHAV, JJ.
DATE : JULY 10, 2014.
On a perusal of the writ petition and the prayer clauses made therein, it appears that the cause for filing the writ petition has been rendered infructuous as the term of Office of the Member of the Gram Panchayat is five years and the petitioner has challenged the election programme published in the year 2003-04.
In view of the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of with no order as to costs.
JUDGE JUDGE
APTE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging the election programme is maintainable after the expiry of the office term.
Abarao Nagoro Dalvi
State of Maharashtra
Others
Vasanti A. Naik
V.K. Jadhav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
