The petitioner retired and received all retiral benefits, stating he had no desire to prosecute the writ petition. The court disposed of the petition accordingly.
Writ petition disposed of with no order as to costs; rule stands discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP3077-03
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 3077/2003
(MANOHAR KUNDLIKRAO AGARE VERSUS STATE OF MAH. & OTHERS)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders
Shri A.C. Dharmadhikari, counsel for the petitioner. Shri N.S. Khubalkar, A.G.P. for the respondents.
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND
V.K. JADHAV, JJ.
DATE : JULY 10, 2014.
Shri Dharmadhikari, the learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions from the petitioner, who is present in the Court today, states that the petitioner has retired from service on attaining the age of superannuation and has received all the retiral benefits. Hence, according to the learned counsel, the petitioner is not desirous of prosecuting the writ petition.
In view of the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of with no order as to costs. Rule stands discharged.
JUDGE JUDGE
APTE
Manohar Kundlikrao Agare
State of Maharashtra
Vasanti A Naik
V.K. Jadhav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
