The court disposed of a criminal bail application as nothing survived, because the trial had concluded and the applicant had been acquitted by the trial court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Tilak 1/1 (7)BA-203-14
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.203 of 2014
Vilash Tanaji Bhudhawale .. Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent
Mr.Vaibhav R. Gaikwad, Advocate for the applicant. Mr.Y.S.Shinde, APP for the Respondent State.
CORAM : ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J. DATED : 17th JUNE, 2014.
P.C. :
1 Heard the learned APP who has drawn my attention to the order dated 1st April 2014 passed by this Court (Coram A.R.Joshi, J). With reference to the directions given in paragraph no.4 of the said order, the learned APP states that the Investigating Officer is present, but further informs the Court that the trial is over, and the applicant and other accused are acquitted. Under the circumstances, nothing survives in the application which stands disposed of.
(ABHAY M.THIPSAY, J)
Vilash Tanaji Bhudhawale
The State of Maharashtra
Abhay M. Thipsay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
