Allowed
Central Bureau of Investigation v. Kripashankar Rajnarayan Mishra and Anr.
Bombay HCALS/18/2014
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
spb/
56als 18.14fl.sxw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 18 OF 2014
Central Bureau of Investigation … Applicant.
V/s.
Shri Kripashankar R. Mishra & Anr.
… Respondents.
Mr. H. S. Venegaonkar for the Applicant. Mr. Suboth Desai for Respondent No.1. Mrs. S. V. Sonawane, APP for the State.
CORAM : A. M. THIPSAY, J. DATE : 16 JUNE, 2014
P.C. :
2 The Application be treated as a memo of Appeal and be numbered accordingly.
3 Necessary amendments shall be carried out within a period of two weeks. The Appeal is admitted.
4 Issue notice to the Respondent No.1, who shall execute a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- before the trial court within a period of four weeks from the receipt of notice by him.
(A.M.THIPSAY, J.)
1/1
Borey
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal application should be treated as a memo of appeal and the appeal admitted.
Central Bureau of Investigation
Shri Kripashankar R. Mishra
A. M. Thipsay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court