The court held that the applicant, a cooperative credit society, had shown sufficient cause for condoning a 45-day delay in filing an application for leave to appeal against an acquittal. The application was allowed, and notice was waived by the respondent.
The application for condonation of delay of 45 days was allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
BHAGWAN BALRAM NAGARI SAHAKARI PATSANSTHA LTD.
V/S SHOBHA LALMANI MISHRA
Mr. V.G. Balu h/f. Mr. V.D. Sonawane, Advocate for applicant. Mr. S.S. Wagh, Advocate for respondent.
CORAM : T.V. NALAWADE, J. DATED : 3rd November, 2014.
ORDER :
[ T.V. NALAWADE, J. ]
ssc/
2 issues framed by the court
Whether sufficient cause has been shown for condonation of delay of 45 days in filing an application for leave to file an appeal against an acquittal.
Whether the applicant, a cooperative credit society, needed to show additional cause for condoning the delay.
BHAGWAN BALRAM NAGARI SAHAKARI PATSANSTHA LTD.
SHOBHA LALMANI MISHRA
T.V. NALAWADE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
