Single judge of Bombay HC allowed Criminal Application and admitted State's appeal against acquittal under PC Act and IPC, noting erroneous interpretation of investigation rank and charge provisions.
Leave to file appeal granted under Section 390 Cr.P.C.; appeal admitted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cri. Appln. No. 1968/13
1
IN THE HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1968 OF 2013
The State of Maharashtra
....Applicant.
Versus
Shri. Shahuraj Digambar Gurav & Anr. ....Respondents.
Mr. A.S. Shinde, APP for State.
Mr. S.G. Chapalgaonkar, Advocate for respndent Nos. 1 and 2.
CORAM : T.V. NALAWADE, J. DATED : 3rd November, 2014.
ORDER :
Cri. Appln. No. 1968/13
2
[ T.V. NALAWADE, J. ]
ssc/
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the Trial Court correctly construed the provisions regarding the rank of the investigating officer and the framed charge under the Prevention of Corruption Act.
Whether leave to file appeal against the acquittal of the respondents should be granted.
How to apply section 390 of Cr.P.C. upon admitting the appeal.
4 provisions across 3 enactments
The State of Maharashtra
Shri. Shahuraj Digambar Gurav & Anr.
T.V. NALAWADE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
