This court condoned a 36-day delay in filing a criminal appeal (Cri. Appln. No. 4123/2013) under the Negotiable Instruments Act. The applicant, former complainant, sought leave to appeal after acquittal of accused respondent 1.
Delay of 36 days condoned; application allowed; notice in Cri. Appln. No. 4122/2013 set for 5.12.2014.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cri. Appln. No. 4123/13
1
IN THE HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4123 OF 2013 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4122 OF 2013
M/s. Deepakkumar Shankarlal and Company
....Applicant.
Versus
Shri. Govind Rajendra Medewar & Anr.
....Respondents.
Mr. S.P. Brahme, Advocate for applicant. Mr. S.R. Palnitkar, APP for State.
Mr. Amol Gandhi, Advocate for respondent No. 1.
CORAM : T.V. NALAWADE, J. DATED : 3rd November, 2014.
ORDER :
Cri. Appln. No. 4123/13
2
[ T.V. NALAWADE, J. ]
ssc/
2 issues framed by the court
Whether sufficient cause was shown for condoning the 36-day delay in filing Criminal Appeal No. 4123/2013.
Whether the application for condonation of delay proceedings be allowed.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s. Deepakkumar Shankarlal and Company
Shri. Govind Rajendra Medewar
T.V. NALAWADE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
