Dismissed
Princess Fatima Forzia and Anr. v. Veetrag Holding Co. Pvt. Ltd.
Bombay HCS/445/1996
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2-S445-1996.DOC
Vishal
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO.445 OF 1996
Princess Fatima Forzia and Anr.
Versus
Veetrag Holding Co.Pvt.Ltd.
…Plaintiffs
..Defendants
None for the Plaintiffs.
Mr.Joran Diwan i/b.Kanga & Co. for the Defendants.
CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED: FEBRUARY 26, 2014
PC:-
1.The suit is listed for directions today. A notice has been
issued on the printed board, as also on the High Court Website, to
the effect that when a suit listed under the caption for directions is
called out, if none appears for the plaintiff/s, the suit will be
dismissed.
2.The names of the plaintiffs and their Advocates are correctly
shown. None appears when the matter is called out. The suit is
dismissed under Order IX Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure,
1908. Interim / ad-interim relief, if any, granted earlier in any
interlocutory proceedings in this suit, shall stand vacated forthwith.
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
1 of 1
1 provisions across 1 enactments
G. S. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court