Suit dismissed due to non-appearance of plaintiffs despite notice on bulletin board and website, invoking Order IX Rule 3 CPC.
Suit dismissed; interim relief vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
6-S2531-96.DOC
Agk
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SUIT NO. 2531 OF 1996
Food Corporation of India…Plaintiffs
Versus
Dinesh P. Thapar, Proprietor…Defendant
None for the Plaintiffs.
None for the Defendants.
CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED: FEBRUARY 27, 2014
PC:-
1.The suit is listed for directions today. A notice has been
issued on the printed board, as also on the High Court Website, to
the effect that when a suit listed for directions is called out, if none
appears for the plaintiff/s, the suit will be dismissed.
2.The names of the plaintiffs and their Advocates are correctly
shown. None appears when the matter is called out. The suit is
dismissed under Order IX Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure,
1908. Interim / ad-interim relief, if any, granted earlier in any
interlocutory proceedings in this suit, shall stand vacated forthwith.
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
1 of 1
1 provisions across 1 enactments
G.S. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court