The High Court allowed the withdrawal of Suit No. 3668 of 1993. The suit was dismissed as withdrawn, court fee was ordered to be refunded, and any interim relief was vacated. No legal principle was enunciated.
Suit allowed to be withdrawn, dismissed with refund of court fee, and interim relief vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
agk
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SUIT NO.3668 OF 1993
Startime Communications (I) Pvt. Ltd...Plaintiffs.
Versus
Esquire Video Film Services Pvt. Ltd. & Ors...Defendants.
Ms. Shilpa Morje i/b Pikale & Co., for the Plaintiffs.
None for the Defendants.
CORAM : G.S. Patel, J. Monday, 3rd February 2014.
P.C. :
1. Learned advocate for the plaintiffs states that she has instructions to withdraw the suit. The suit is allowed to be withdrawn.
2. The suit is dismissed as withdrawn. Refund of Court Fee as per Rules.
3. Interim / ad-interim relief, if any, granted earlier in any interlocutory proceedings in this suit, shall stand vacated forthwith.
(G.S. Patel, J.)
1 of 1
G.S. Patel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court