Plaintiff gave instructions to withdraw their civil suit No. 2492 of 1992 against Dena Bank. The court dismissed the suit as withdrawn and ordered refund of court fee per Rules.
Suit dismissed as withdrawn. Refund of court fee as per Rules.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
agk
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SUIT NO.2492 OF 1992
Sunit Chandrakant Khatau and Another..Plaintiffs.
Versus
Dena Bank
..Defendants.
Ms. Sheetal Shah i/b M/s. Mehta & Dirdhar, for the Plaintiffs.
CORAM : G.S. Patel, J. Monday, 3rd February 2014.
P.C. :
1. Ms. Shah, learned advocate for the plaintiffs, states that she has instructions to withdraw the suit.
2. The suit is dismissed as withdrawn. Refund of Court fee as per Rules.
(G.S. Patel, J.)
1 of 1
Sunit Chandrakant Khatau and Another
Dena Bank
G.S. Patel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court