Uttar Predesh Network Private Limited v. --
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitions for company scheme recognition sought withdrawal before this court dismissed the matter consequentially upon such withdrawal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
5 CSP 521-13.DOC
pps
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMPANY SCHEME PETITION NO. 520 OF 2013 WITH COMPANY SUMMONS FOR DIRECTION NO.482 OF 2013
Haryana Cybernet Pvt. Ltd.
..Petitioner.
WITH COMPANY SCHEME PETITION NO. 521 OF 2013 WITH COMPANY SUMMONS FOR DIRECTION NO.483 OF 2013
Kerala Communication Netword Pvt. Ltd.
..Petitioner.
WITH COMPANY SCHEME PETITION NO. 522 OF 2013 WITH
COMPANY SUMMONS FOR DIRECTION NO.484 OF 2013
Punjab Cybernet Pvt. Ltd.
..Petitioner.
WITH COMPANY SCHEME PETITION NO. 523 OF 2013 WITH
COMPANY SUMMONS FOR DIRECTION NO.485 OF 2013
Uttar Pradesh Cybernet Pvt. Ltd.
..Petitioner.
WITH
1 of 2
5 CSP 521-13.DOC
COMPANY SCHEME PETITION NO. 524 OF 2013 WITH COMPANY SUMMONS FOR DIRECTION NO.486 OF 2013
M.P.Network Pvt. Ltd.
..Petitioner.
Mr. Rajesh Shah, for the Petitioners.
Mr. D.P.Singh, for the Regional Director.
Ms. Rupa Sutar, Asst. Official Liquidator.
CORAM : G.S. Patel, J.
Friday, 31st January 2014.
P.C. :
1. At the request of Mr.Shah, petitions are allowed to be withdrawn.
(G.S. Patel, J.)
2 of 2
Haryana Cybernet Pvt. Ltd.
Kerala Communication Network Pvt. Ltd.
Punjab Cybernet Pvt. Ltd.
Uttar Pradesh Cybernet Pvt. Ltd.
M.P. Network Pvt. Ltd.
G.S. Patel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court