The suit was dismissed as withdrawn because the plaintiff had died after a related counter-suit for redemption was decreed, and his heirs were not yet brought on record.
Suit dismissed as withdrawn; court fee refunded; interim reliefs vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
agk
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SUIT NO.3373 OF 1989
Rai Bahadur Kawar Rajnath..Plaintiff.
Versus
Union of India and Another
..Defendants.
Ms. Lata Bachani i/b I. R. Joshi & Co., for the Plaintiff.
None for the Defendants.
CORAM : G.S. Patel, J. Monday, 3rd February 2014.
P.C. :
1.The learned advocate for the plaintiff states that the suit is infructuous
as a counter-suit for redemption has already been decreed. The Plaintiff has, in
the meantime, passed away and his heirs have not yet been brought on record.
2. The suit is dismissed as withdrawn. Refund of Court fee as per Rules.
3. Interim / ad-interim relief, if any, granted earlier in any interlocutory proceedings in this suit, shall stand vacated forthwith.
(G.S. Patel, J.)
1 of 1
Rai Bahadur Kawar Rajnath
Union of India
G.S. Patel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court