The appellant sought leave to withdraw the Letters Patent Appeal. The court recorded the sister petitioner’s pursis and noted the respondents’ lack of objection, subsequently disposing of the appeal accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
lpa.20.13.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
Letters Patent Appeal No.20 of 2013
Panjabrao Mohanji Phalke
-vs-
Jeevan Tulshiramji Phalke and others
Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders. or directions and Registrar's orders.
Mr. A.A. Naik, Counsel for the Appellant.
CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI AND P.B. VARALE, JJ.
DATE : JANUARY 29, 2013.
Mr. Naik, learned Counsel for the
appellant/petitioner has filed pursis seeking leave to withdraw Letters Patent Appeal in view of the said pursis.
Mr. B.H. Shambharkar, learned Counsel for respondent no.1 and Mr. T.R. Kankale, learned A.G.P. for respondent no.4. have no objection.
Pursis taken on record as Annexure 'X'. Accordingly Letters Patent Appeal is disposed of in terms of the pursis.
JUDGE JUDGE
*sdw
Panjabrao Mohanji Phalke
Jeevan Tulshiramji Phalke
B.P. Dharwadhari
P.B. Varale
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
