Petitioner challenging denial of time-bound service scheme benefit. Respondents confirmed action post-subsequent orders. Grievance redressed; petition disposed without orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
Writ Petition No. 4671 of 2012 Sunil and ors v. The State of Maharashtra and ors
Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Court's or Judge's Orders.
Ms Kirti Satpute, Adv for petitioner Mr N. Khubalkar, AGP for respdts Coram : B. P. Dharmadhikari and Prasanna B. Varale, JJ Dated : 28th January 2013
2
impugned order is sought to be withdrawn in the case of petitioner.
JUDGE
JUDGE
joshi
Sunil and ors
The State of Maharashtra and ors
B. P. Dharmadhikari
Prasanna B. Varale
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
