An appeal was filed against the dismissal of an application for a temporary injunction regarding a suit property. The bench observed that principles of lis pendens would apply to any transfer and noted the appellants had previously failed to seek similar relief. The appeal was rejected as lacking merit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ao96.12
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 96 OF 2012 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7707 OF 2012
Shridhar Gangadhar Naik and others ...Appellants
versus
Bhimshankar Dattatraya Deshmane and others ...Respondents
Mr. R.B. Deshmukh, advocate for the appellants Mr. A.S. Deshpande, advocate for respondent Nos. 1 to 12.
CORAM : M.T. JOSHI, J.
DATED : 21st OCTOBER, 2013
PER COURT :-
ao96.12
Bhagirathibai died in the month of April, 1994. As such, plaintiffs/appellants have got 1/4 share in the suit property.
ao96.12
-3-
sought for.
( M. T. JOSHI, J.)
rlj/
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal against the dismissal of an application for temporary injunction has merit considering the lapse of time and prior failure to seek relief.
Shridhar Gangadhar Naik and others
Bhimshankar Dattatraya Deshmane and others
M.T. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
