Ashok Nagnath Gulve v. S.S.Kshatriya and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner submitted compliance of the order during the pendency of the contempt petition, rendering nothing left in proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 236 OF 2013
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 1732 OF 2012
(Ashok s/o Nagnath Gulve Vs. S.S. Kshatriya and
others)
.....
Mr. Ramraje A. Deshmukh, advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. V.H. Dighe, A.G.P. for the respondent/State.
.....
CORAM : M.T. JOSHI, J.
DATED : 23rd October, 2013
PER COURT :
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits
that the order is complied with during the pendency
of the present Contempt Petition. In the
circumstances, nothing survives in the present
contempt proceedings. The Contempt Petition is,
therefore, disposed of without any order as to costs.
[ M.T. JOSHI ] JUDGE
npj/cp236-13
Ashok s/o Nagnath Gulve
M.T. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court